| Graffiti
are such badly perceived by the society, is this because of their support
( walls) or well due to the fact that they are sanctioned that the graffiti
do not access to the status of Art and benefit at the very most from
the designation " Urban Culture "? |
(896 photos) |
Is this
simply because it is rapid and spontaneous (notably concerning the
tag or the transfer) that it is not appreciated to its just value? |
|
(1729 photos) |
|
(945 photos)
|
|
In a first time ( and this since the prehistory! ) it makes call in the notion of the Group, the membership (the emblem of the fish in antiquity was the sign of Christianity ...),then, in a time second, it serves also to express ideas and opinions (whole a bunch in May 1968) but also a lot of bullshits (to be honest...) |
(656 photos)
|
However
we can note that since a fifteen of years the graffiti has modernized
(beautified?) and seeks to make call to the emotion of the passer-by
even if sometimes it can take a perhaps aggressive unusual form. |
|
 |
